ESPN.complete Disappointment

Bleacher Report writers, if you’ve ever doubted the premise of this site, namely that you—the educated, passionate fan—can produce better content than the average journalist, look no further than this recent article on ESPN.com.

I am not familiar with the author, Graham Watson, and my intention is not to disparage her work. In fact, I would much prefer to recognize a positive example than criticize someone’s shortcoming.

However, after reading her recent piece “Notre Dame looking to turn the corner after disappointing 2007 campaign,” I was so disappointed, I felt like turning the corner… and marching back to Bleacher Report.

Her article is well-researched and factually accurate—but sorely lacking analysis or opinion. I already read the Blue Ribbon preview on Notre Dame. I don’t need another recap of last year’s statistics, this year’s schedule, and interviews given at last Friday’s media day, all of which have been available for free at und.com for more than a week.

Unfortunately, there was quite literally nothing in the piece that led me to believe her press credential had provided any insight into Notre Dame Football. In fact, several B/R writers have written more compelling articles about the Irish in recent weeks—without access to Charlie Weis and his players.

What does all this mean for you—the Bleacher Report writer?

First, there are readers who are hungry for content about their favorite team—in my case, Notre Dame. Second, primary sources like an athletic department website provide all the data, reports and interviews you need to stay informed. Definitely use those resources to form the foundation of your article. But understand that information is just as readily available to us as readers.

What we want is for you to interpret, analyze and offer your opinion—Bleacher Report gives you that platform. Please take full advantage… unless you’re a USC fan.